Section: INFORMATION SECURITY GOVERNANCE

Explanation
Updated security policies are required to align management objectives with security procedures; management objectives translate into policy; policy translates into procedures. Security procedures will necessitate specialized teams such as the computer incident response and management group as well as specialized tools such as the security mechanisms that comprise the security architecture. Security awareness will promote the policies, procedures and appropriate use of the security mechanisms.

Section: INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

The security metrics should be designed so that there is a relationship to the performance of the overall security program in terms of effectiveness measurement. Use of security metrics occurs after the risk assessment process and does not measure it. Measurement of the incident response team performance is included in the overall program performance, so this is an incomplete answer.

= Standardization of compliance requirements is the best approach to reduce unnecessary duplication of compliance activities, as it allows for a common understanding of the objectives and expectations of various stakeholders, such as regulators, auditors, customers, and business partners. Standardization also facilitates the alignment of compliance activities with the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance, and enables the identification and elimination of redundant or conflicting controls. Reference = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 721; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, question 952 Learn more:

Section: INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

Explanation
An effective information security awareness training program should aim to improve the knowledge, skills and behavior of the employees regarding information security. One of the ways to measure the effectiveness of such a program is to conduct phishing simulations, which are mock phishing attacks that test the employees’ ability to identify and report phishing emails. An increase in the identification rate during phishing simulations indicates that the employees have learned how to recognize and avoid phishing attempts, which is one of the common threats to information security. Therefore, this is the best indication of an effective information security awareness training program among the given options.
The other options are not as reliable or relevant as indicators of an effective information security awareness training program. An increase in the frequency of phishing tests does not necessarily mean that the employees are learning from them or that the tests are aligned with the learning objectives of the program. An increase in positive user feedback may reflect the satisfaction or engagement of the employees with the program, but it does not measure the actual learning outcomes or behavior changes. An increase in the speed of incident resolution may be influenced by other factors, such as the availability and efficiency of the incident response team, the severity and complexity of the incidents, or the tools and processes used for incident management.
Moreover, the speed of incident resolution does not reflect the prevention or reduction of incidents, which is a more desirable goal of an information security awareness training program. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2022, pp. 201-202, 207-208.
CISM Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, ISACA, 2022, QID 1001.

Section: INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The data owner is the most appropriate role to determine access rights for specific users of an application because they have legal rights and complete control over data elements4. They are also responsible for approving data glossaries and definitions, ensuring the accuracy of information, and supervising operations related to data quality5. The data custodian is responsible for the safe custody, transport, and storage of the data and implementation of business rules, but not for determining access rights4. The system administrator is responsible for managing the security and storage infrastructure of data sets according to the organization’s data governance policies, but not for determining access rights5. Senior management is responsible for setting the strategic direction and priorities for data governance, but not for determining access rights5. Reference: 5 https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/data-owners-vs-data-stewards-vs-data-custodians-the-3-types-of-data-masters-and-why-you-should-employ-them/ 4 https://cloudgal42.com/data-privacy-difference-between-data-owner-controller-and-data-custodian-processor/

Section: INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Section: INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The data owner is the person who has the authority and responsibility to classify, grant access, and monitor the use of the CRM data. The data owner should ensure that the data is protected according to its classification and business requirements. The data custodian is the person who implements the controls and procedures to protect the data as directed by the data owner. The information security manager is the person who advises the data owner on the best practices and standards for data security. The internal IT audit is the function that evaluates the effectiveness and compliance of the data security controls and procedures.
References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Roles and Responsibilities, Subsection: Data Owner, Page 23.

Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
Senior management seeks to understand the business justification for investing in security. This can best be accomplished by tying security to key business objectives. Senior management will not be as interested in technical risks or examples of successful attacks if they are not tied to the impact on business environment and objectives. Industry best practices are important to senior management but, again, senior management will give them the right level of importance when they are presented in terms of key business objectives.

= A tabletop exercise is the best type of exercise for an incident response team at the first drill, as it is a low- cost, low-risk, and high-value method to test and evaluate the incident response plan, procedures, roles, and capabilities. A tabletop exercise is a simulation of a realistic scenario that involves a security incident, and requires the participation and discussion of the incident response team members and other relevant stakeholders. The tabletop exercise allows the incident response team to identify and address the gaps, issues, or challenges in the incident response process, and to improve the communication, coordination, and collaboration among the team members and other parties. The tabletop exercise also helps to enhance the knowledge, skills, and confidence of the incident response team members, and to prepare them for more complex or advanced exercises or real incidents.
A red team exercise (A) is a type of exercise that involves a group of ethical hackers or security experts who act as adversaries and attempt to compromise the organization’s security defenses, systems, or processes. A red team exercise is a high-cost, high-risk, and high-value method to test and evaluate the security posture and resilience of the organization, and to identify and exploit the security weaknesses or vulnerabilities. However, a red team exercise is not the best type of exercise for an incident response team at the first drill, as it is more suitable for a mature and experienced team that has already tested and validated the incident response plan, procedures, roles, and capabilities.
A black box penetration test (B) is a type of security testing that simulates a malicious attack on the organization’s systems or processes, without any prior knowledge or information about them. A black box penetration test is a high-cost, high-risk, and high-value method to test and evaluate the security posture and resilience of the organization, and to identify and exploit the security weaknesses or vulnerabilities. However, a black box penetration test is not the best type of exercise for an incident response team at the first drill, as it is more suitable for a mature and experienced team that has already tested and validated the incident response plan, procedures, roles, and capabilities.
A disaster recovery exercise © is a type of exercise that simulates a catastrophic event that disrupts or destroys the organization’s critical systems or processes, and requires the activation and execution of the disaster recovery plan, procedures, roles, and capabilities. A disaster recovery exercise is a high-cost, high- risk, and high-value method to test and evaluate the disaster recovery posture and resilience of the organization, and to identify and address the recovery issues or challenges. However, a disaster recovery exercise is not the best type of exercise for an incident response team at the first drill, as it is more suitable for a mature and experienced team that has already tested and validated the incident response plan, procedures, roles, and capabilities.
References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Plan, Subsection: Testing and Maintenance, page 184-1851

Section: INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT